Catalog

Claude 3 vs ChatGPT 4 - A Comprehensive Guide [2024]

April 1, 2024 412 views

In the world of Artificial Intelligence, progress is always on the rise and this is a testament to man’s creativity and technology’s progress. Chatbots have significantly changed the way we communicate with machines. There are a few notable chatbots out there and among these, two prominent figures stand out: Claude 3 and ChatGPT 4.

In this guide, we’ll take a closer look at Claude 3 vs ChatGPT 4, and how these two models stack up against each other. We’ll take a deep dive into their design, functions, and performance to help users make a well-informed decision.

Part 1. What are Claude 3 and ChatGPT 4?

Before going deep into the comparison of Claude 3 vs ChatGPT 4, here’s a brief overview of both models and their functionalities:

The Claude 3 is an AI model developed by Anthropic. It is a collection of three models: the “Claude Haiku”, “Claude Sonnet”, and “Claude Opus.” Each model has its level of performance.

Users can choose the model that best suits their needs in terms of cost, speed, and intelligence. The models can be used to create content, generate code, and even carry conversations across languages.

Haiku is one of the smallest and fastest Claude models. This model is best suited for tasks that require speed but also are cost-effective. The Haiku model is, as expected, the least effective of the three models in the family of Claude 3 models.

The Sonnet is the middle model of the three models. It does well in cognitive tests and has a longer processing time than the Opus model. The Sonnet aims to combine speed with performance. The Sonnet is better suited for enterprise applications like data mining, quality control, and product recommendation.

The Opus model is the smartest of the three models. Opus outperforms the other models, such as the Sonnet and Haiku, as well as most other AI systems, on many of the evaluation criteria. For example, Opus outperforms competitors in basic math and graduate-level expert reasoning.

On the other hand, OpenAI’s new language model, ChatGPT 4, is capable of producing text that mimics human speech. This model advances the technology used by ChatGPT, which is currently based on GPT-3.5.

OpenAI claims that this next-gen language model surpasses ChatGPT’s capabilities in three key dimensions: creativity; visual input; and extended context.

ChatGPT-4 is much better at both creating and collaborating with users on creative projects. Examples of these include music, screenplays, technical writing, and even “learning a user’s writing style.”

ChatGPT-4's "multimodal" capability is one of its most exciting new features. This means that not only will it be able to process text, but it will also be able to process images. In other words, a user will be able to send a picture along with text, and both will be processed and discussed.

Part 2. Claude 3 and ChatGPT 4: Comparing the Features?

When comparing Claude 3 vs ChatGPT 4, several features can be used. Some of these include:

Advanced Reasoning

Claude 3 excels in complex reasoning tasks. It understands the logic and reasoning behind the user’s queries and provides detailed explanations and insights. It is well-suited for higher-order thinking tasks. ChatGPT 4 also excels in complex and abstract reasoning tasks but is not as effective as the Claude 3 model.

Data Processing

The main strengths of Claude 3 are its strong data processing power, its ability to process large amounts of data quickly and effectively, and the fact that it uses a structured approach to its data processing, which guarantees the accuracy and reliability of its answers.

Another thing to keep in mind is the number of words. As mentioned above, Claude 3 has a word count of up to 200,000, whereas GPT4 has a word limit of 64,000. This means that Claude has a much larger ‘context window’, which means that it can retain a much larger number of conversations and can produce longer text.

This is especially useful for enterprise workflows that work with large datasets and documents. When compared to ChatGPT 4, Claude 3 has the upper hand here too.

Privacy Concerns

Privacy concerns also arise with chatbots such as GPT-4. Most GPT users are aware that the conversations they have with the GPT-4 bot are saved to help train the models to produce more accurate results.

However, this can raise privacy concerns, especially when sensitive information is involved. Claude 3, on the other hand, does not save conversations to help train models and removes prompts and outputs on the backend within 90 days.

Multimodal Capabilities

Claude 3 works well with text, images, and audio to deliver rich and complete responses. Its capacity to process and create content across multiple modes of communication improves user experience and allows for more varied interactions.

ChatGPT 4 is capable of handling text-based interactions, but it may have some restrictions in processing and creating content across multiple modes compared to Claude. Nevertheless, it still shows versatility in handling various types of input, although with some limitations.

Below is a table showing how Claude 3 models beat the ChatGPT 4 across multiple benchmarks.

Claude 3 and ChatGPT 4 across multiple benchmarks

Trustpilotstars4.8
WPS Office- Free All-in-One Office Suite
  • Use Word, Excel, and PPT for FREE, No Ads.

  • Edit PDF files with the powerful PDF toolkit.

  • Microsoft-like interface. Easy to learn. 100% Compatibility.

  • Boost your productivity with WPS's abundant free Word, Excel, PPT, and CV templates.

5,820,008 User
avator
Algirdas Jasaitis
logo

Part 3: Claude 3 and ChatGPT 4 pricing?

Claude 3 pricing:

Claude 3 consists of 3 models, each with different functionalities. Therefore, the price varies per model.

Opus

Cost: $15/million tokens for input and $75/million tokens for output.

Sonnet

Cost: $3.00/million tokens for input and $15.00/million tokens for output.

Haiku

Cost: $0.25/million tokens for input and $1.25/million tokens for output.

ChatGPT 4 pricing:

ChatGPT 4 provides 3 pricing models; Plus, Team, and Enterprise.

Plus

  • Access to GPT-4,

  • Browse, create, and use GPTs

  • Access to additional tools like DALL·E, Browsing, Advanced Data Analysis, and more

Cost:

$20 per user, billed monthly

Team

Everything in Plus, and:

  • Higher message caps on GPT-4 and tools like DALL·E, Browsing, Advanced Data Analysis, and more

  • Create and share GPTs with your workspace

  • Admin console for workspace management

  • Team data is excluded from training by default.

Cost:

$25 per user/month, billed annually

$30 per user/month, billed monthly

Enterprise

Everything in Team, and:

  • Unlimited, high-speed access to GPT-4 and tools like DALL·E, Browsing, Advanced Data Analysis, and more

  • Expanded context window for longer inputs

  • SAML SSO

  • Enterprise data is excluded from training by default & custom data retention windows. Learn more

  • Admin controls, domain verification, and analytics

  • Priority support & ongoing account management

Cost:

To be discussed with the OpenAI Sales team

Part 4: Is It Possible for Claude 3 to Surpass ChatGPT 4?

Based on various benchmarks when comparing Claude 3 vs ChatGPT 4, Claude 3 has been shown to surpass ChatGPT 4. The most intelligent model, Opus, outperforms ChatGPT 4 on most of the common evaluation benchmarks including MMLU, basic mathematics (GSM8K), math, coding, reasoning, knowledge QA, and HelloSwag. Additionally, Claude 3 can analyze multiple images in a single request (up to a maximum of 20).

Also, Claude 3 has a maximum length of 200,000 words, while GPT4’s maximum length is 64,000 words. As a result, Claude’s context window is much larger, allowing it to store many more conversations and create longer text.

Part 5: Efficient AI Tools in the Office Field - WPS AI

WPS AI is an artificial intelligence technology developed by WPS Office. It helps users perform various tasks when using the WPS Writer and WPS pdf editor. The WPS AI assistant can help with content creation, data analysis, event planning, and many more.

Below is a step-by-step guide on how to use WPS AIin WPS Writer.

Step 1: Open the WPS office, and then open a new document in WPS docs.

Opening a new document in WPS docs


Step 2: Enable the AI Writer in WPS docs by clicking "WPS AI" in the upper-right corner of the page.

Accessing WPS AI


Step 3: On your writing page, type “@ai” and click enter. This activates the WPS AI assistant

Enabling the WPS AI assistant


Step 4: Enter your prompt

The AI Write platform pop-up will provide you with a selection of options.

Select or enter what you would like WPS AI to create

Exploring various available prompts for WPS AI


Step 5: In addition to content creation, you can also use the formatting and editing tools in WPS Office to improve your content quality. With the help of the formatting tools, you can add headlines to your text, bullet points to your text, and more. You can also change the spacing in your document and perform various editing tasks with the formatting tools.

Editing and formatting WPS AI text


Step 6: Save and Export your article

After you’re satisfied with the content and formatting of your article, you can save it. WPS AI Writer allows you to save your article in various file formats, including.doc ,.docx,.pdf, etc.

You can choose the format that best suits your needs and save your article to your favorite folder on your computer.

Saving a document in WPS Office


As a content writer, WPS AI has made my workflow much more efficient and productive. The AI-driven features built into the WPS Office suite support me every step of the way. Whether I’m writing an article, a report, or a presentation, WPS AI’s natural language processing helps me fine-tune and improve my writing.

One of the best things about WPS AI is its ability to create content suggestions. Content suggestions are insightful suggestions that help improve clarity, consistency, and engagement.

FAQs

1. What are the differences between the three models of Claude 3?

The most intelligent model is Claude 3 Opus, which performs best in the market on high-complexity tasks. It handles open-ended queries and face-to-face scenarios with great dexterity and human-level comprehension.

The fastest model is Claude 3 Sonnet, which balances intelligence with speed—especially on enterprise workloads—delivering strong performance at an affordable price compared to its competitors.

The most compact model is the Claude 3 Haiku, which offers near-instant responsiveness. Simple queries and requests are answered with unmatched speed, allowing users to create smooth AI experiences that emulate human interactions.

2. Is it possible to interpret images with Claude.ai?

With the new vision capabilities of the Claude 3 family, Claude can now understand and analyze images. This opens up new opportunities for multimodal interactions. You can now provide text and image inputs with Claude, enriching your conversations and enabling powerful new use cases.

3. Is Claude 3 better than ChatGPT 4?

According to Google-backed Anthropic, the Claude 3 language model outperforms the GPT language model that powers ChatGPT 4 across a variety of cognitive tests.

Summary

The comparison of Claude 3 vs ChatGPT 4 provides interesting insights into the ever-changing conversational AI landscape. Both models represent significant advances in natural language processing. However, each model has its strengths and weaknesses.

We recommend the WPS AI assistant in the WPS Office suite for professionals in various fields to assist with content generation, data analysis, and many more as it offers very effective suggestions to help make your work easier and more efficient.


15 years of office industry experience, tech lover and copywriter. Follow me for product reviews, comparisons, and recommendations for new apps and software.