Other PDF Issues

Why Acrobat and CommonLook Produce Different PDF Accessibility Results

John WilsonJohn Wilson Nov 3, 2026 869 views

Question details

Users notice discrepancies in accessibility reports where Acrobat Pro passes a PDF, but CommonLook flags WCAG or PDF/UA compliance issues.

Why Acrobat and CommonLook Produce Different PDF Accessibility Results
Product
PDF Validation Tools
Device & OS
not provided
Scenario
Validating PDF accessibility for strict WCAG or PDF/UA standard compliance.
Observed behavior
Acrobat's built-in accessibility checker reports the PDF as accessible, while CommonLook identifies remaining structural, tagging, or nesting issues.
Before you start

Ensure you clearly understand the specific accessibility standards your organization requires (such as WCAG 2.1 AA or PDF/UA) before evaluating the validation results.

Solution 1Recommended

Use Dedicated Validators for Complete Compliance

Rely on Acrobat for initial checks, but use dedicated validation tools like CommonLook or PAC for full PDF/UA compliance.

Acrobat's built-in accessibility checker is an excellent tool for an initial review, but it only evaluates a subset of WCAG requirements and is not a complete PDF/UA validation tool.

Additionally, editing or saving documents in Acrobat can sometimes alter PDF tags, nesting, and structure, leading to discrepancies when the same file is checked in more stringent tools like CommonLook.

1
Run initial checks in Acrobat

Use the Accessibility Checker in Adobe Acrobat Pro to catch basic errors like missing alternative text, missing document language, or title issues.

2
Validate with a dedicated tool

Export the PDF and open it in a specialized validation tool such as CommonLook PDF Validator or the free PAC (PDF Accessibility Checker) to evaluate strict PDF/UA compliance.

3
Perform manual testing

Navigate the document manually using a screen reader (such as NVDA or JAWS) to verify reading order, logical structure, and contextual accuracy of alt text.

Use Dedicated Validators for Complete Compliance
Manual Testing Required: No automated tool can fully guarantee accessibility. Manual checks are always necessary to ensure logical reading order and accurate descriptions.
Free Microsoft Office alternative

Create Source Documents Seamlessly with WPS Office

While specialized tools handle deep accessibility validation, WPS Office provides a lightweight, free, and highly compatible suite for creating and formatting your source documents before converting them to PDF.

  1. 1. Draft your content: Open WPS Writer, Spreadsheet, or Presentation to easily draft and structure your source content.
  2. 2. Export to PDF: Navigate to the Menu and click 'Export to PDF' to generate a standard PDF file.
  3. 3. Proceed to validation: Take the exported PDF to your preferred accessibility validation tool for final WCAG or PDF/UA checks.
Free and lightweight Office suiteHighly compatible with Microsoft Office Word, Excel, and PowerPoint formatsCreate and export high-quality PDFs effortlesslyFamiliar and intuitive user interface for easy migration
microsoft office alternative - wps office

Frequently Asked Questions

Why does Acrobat change PDF tags when saving?

When Acrobat processes a document during saving or editing, it may attempt to optimize or restructure the file. This background process can inadvertently alter manual tagging or nesting created by other specialized accessibility tools.

What is the PAC tool?

PAC (PDF Accessibility Checker) is a free, dedicated validation tool designed specifically to check PDFs against the strict PDF/UA (Universal Accessibility) standard, offering deeper structural insights than standard checkers.

Can automated tools fully guarantee WCAG compliance?

No. Automated tools can only check a subset of WCAG requirements. Structural logic, reading order, color contrast context, and the accuracy of alternative text always require manual verification by a human tester.

Which tool should I use first for PDF accessibility?

It is generally recommended to use your source authoring tool's built-in checker or Acrobat's accessibility checker for an initial pass to fix surface-level issues, followed by dedicated tools like CommonLook or PAC for strict compliance validation.