logo
search
Office Settings & Configuration

How to Fix Duplicate Tables in Microsoft Access Relationships

Maira MehtabMaira Mehtab Sep 22, 2026 868 views

Question details

The user needs to resolve an issue in Microsoft Access where modifying referential integrity options produces a conflict due to two copies of the same table being connected to a junction table.

Product
Microsoft Access
Device & OS
not provided
Scenario
Changing relationship options to enable cascade updates or cascade deletes in the Relationships window.
Observed behavior
Access displays a visual duplicate of a table and throws a conflict error when attempting to modify the referential integrity settings for that relationship.
Before you start

Before modifying table relationships, review your primary and foreign keys in Design View to ensure they are properly configured.

Solution 1Recommended

Delete Duplicate Relationship and Modify Options

Resolve the referential integrity conflict by deleting the relationship tied to the duplicate alias table, then modifying the original table's relationship settings.

Microsoft Access sometimes creates visual aliases of tables (usually with a '_1' suffix) if the table is added to the Relationships window twice. This can prevent you from applying cascading updates or deletes.

1
Locate the Duplicate Table

Open your database, navigate to the 'Database Tools' tab, and click 'Relationships'. Look for the table that appears twice in the workspace.

2
Delete the Extra Relationship

Right-click the relationship line connecting the duplicate table to your junction table, and select 'Delete' from the context menu.

3
Change Relationship Options

Double-click the relationship line of the original table. In the 'Edit Relationships' dialog box, check the boxes for 'Cascade Update Related Fields' and 'Cascade Delete Related Records', then click 'OK'.

4
Inspect Database Structure

If Access still produces an error grouping tables together, open the affected tables in Design View to verify that your field data types match and there are no hidden conflicting relationships.

Database Specific Behavior: Access behavior can depend heavily on the specific file and existing data. If conflicts remain, ensure no existing records violate the new referential integrity rules you are trying to apply.
Free Microsoft Office alternative

Looking for a Lightweight Office Suite?

While WPS Office does not include a database management tool like Microsoft Access, it is an exceptional, free alternative for your everyday document, spreadsheet, and presentation needs. Experience seamless compatibility with Microsoft Word, Excel, and PowerPoint files in one lightweight application.

  1. 1. Download WPS Office: Visit the official WPS website and download the free installer for your Windows, Mac, or Linux operating system.
  2. 2. Install the Software: Run the downloaded setup file and follow the quick on-screen instructions to complete the installation process.
  3. 3. Open Your Files: Launch WPS Office and directly open your existing Microsoft Word, Excel, or PowerPoint documents without losing any formatting.
Highly compatible with Microsoft Office formats (DOCX, XLSX, PPTX)Free and lightweight suite for daily document tasksFamiliar, tabbed user interface for easy navigationSeamless migration with no learning curve required
microsoft office alternative - wps office

Frequently Asked Questions

Why does Access show a table with a '_1' suffix in the Relationships window?

Access creates a visual duplicate or 'alias' of a table, adding a '_1' suffix, when you add the same table to the Relationships workspace multiple times or when you create multiple complex relationships involving the same tables.

How do I enforce referential integrity in Access?

Open the Relationships window, double-click the relationship line connecting your tables, and check the 'Enforce Referential Integrity' box in the Edit Relationships dialog.

What causes a relationship conflict when enabling cascade updates?

Conflicts usually occur if the existing data in the related tables already violates referential integrity rules, or if duplicate alias tables confuse the database engine when it attempts to apply the cascade logic.